Who-5 wellbeing index validity

The generic questionnaire who5 wellbeing index who5, which measures the construct of mental wellbeing has been widely used in several populations across countries. Originally developed to assess both positive and negative wellbeing, this five question version use only positively phrased questions to avoid symptomrelated language. World health organization, 1998 is a selfreport measure of wellbeing. Who5 wellbeing index who5 the who5 is a short, selfadministered measure of wellbeing over the last two weeks 15, 16. Item response theory analyses in studies of younger persons and elderly persons indicate that the measure has good construct validity as a unidimensional scale. Development and preliminary psychometric properties of a wellbeing index for medical students. The world health organisation five wellbeing index who5 is a short selfreported measure of current mental wellbeing. The internal validity or consistency of the selfrating scale showed that the short version of the. Validation of a swahili version of the world health. In primary care, the world health organization wellbeing index who5 performed better than 2 other questionnaires and unaided clinical diagnosis as a depression screening tool. Wellbeing measures in primary health carethe depcare project.

Testretest reliability and measurement error of the. Since this time the who5 has been validated in a number of studies with regard to both clinical and psychometric validity. How to use five items rated on 6point likert scale subjective quality of life based on positive mood good spirits, relaxation, vitality being active and waking up fresh and rested, and general interest being interested in things higher scores mean better wellbeing available in many languages click here for website for who 5. The world health organisation five wellbeing index who5. Who five wellbeing index was as valid as the full 22item index. The world health organizationfive wellbeing index who5 is a short selfreport instrument that appears suitable for this purpose. The who5 wellbeing index performed the best in screening. This study is the first to assess the reliability and validity of the who5 in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Validity of the fiveitem who wellbeing index who5 in an elderly. Efficacy of the wellbeing index to identify distress and stratify wellbeing. Research design and methods ninetyone adolescents with type 1 diabetes age 17. The measure was first introduced in its present form in 1998 by the who regional office in europe as part of the depcare project on wellbeing measures in primary health care.

Validity of the fiveitem who wellbeing index who5 in. T, which is short and easy to use as a screening tool for major depression in primary care patients. In recent years, the who wellbeing index who5 has been used as a screening measure for depression. The 5item world health organization wellbeing index who5 is a short and generic global rating scale measuring subjective wellbeing. The who5 was first presented by the who regional office in europe at a 1998 who meeting in stockholm as an element in the depcare project on the measures of wellbeing in primary health care. The world health organization5 wellbeing index who5 can be used as a tool when screening for depressive symptoms, monitoring emotional wellbeing and. Furthermore, a statistically significant negative correlation. As there was a strong correlation with the who 5 wellbeing index, the hero wellness scale clinicians who wish to. The 5item world health organization wellbeing index who5 is among the most widely used questionnaires assessing subjective psychological wellbeing. This study is the first to assess the reliability and. This study intended to test the reliability and validity of two simple psychological screening scales, the world health organization wellbeing index who5 and the 9item patient health questionnaire phq9, in patients with chronic illness in taiwan and to understand the psychological wellbeing of patients with chronic illness e. The world health organisation five wellbeing index who5 corc. Awata s, bech p, yoshida s, hirai m, suzuki s, yamashita m, ohara a, hinokio y, matsuoka h, oka y. Validation of the who5 wellbeing index in adolescents with type.

Concurrent validity was examined by calculating correlation coefficients among all measures. How to use five items rated on 6point likert scale subjective quality of life based on positive mood good spirits, relaxation, vitality being active and waking up fresh and rested, and general interest being interested in things higher scores mean better wellbeing available in many languages click here for website for who5. Validation of the who5 wellbeing index in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. The scale has adequate validity both as a screening tool for depression and as an outcome measure in clinical trials and has been applied.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the testretest. More cases of depression could be identified by using the who5. Reliability and validity of the japanese version of the world health organizationfive wellbeing index in the context of detecting. How to use five items rated on 6point likert scale subjective quality of life based on positive mood good spirits, relaxation, vitality being active and waking. It consists of five positively worded items that are rated on 6point likert scale, ranging from 0 at no the time to 5 all of the time. The whofive wellbeing index who5 is a short selfreport instrument that appears suitable for this purpose. Sensitivity and specificity of the who5 were tested against those for. We conducted a systematic search for literature on the who. Since its first publication in 1998, the who5 has been translated into more than 30 languages and has been used in research studies all over the world. The who5 wellbeing index is a questionnaire that measures current mental wellbeing time frame the previous two weeks. The questionnaire has demonstrated sufficient psychometric properties. The who 5item wellbeing index who5 is a short screening instrument for the detection of depression in the general population, which has not yet been evaluated. Ability of a 9item wellbeing index to identify distress and stratify quality of life in us workers.